![]() The Eucharist, as the supreme sacramental manifestation of communion in the Church, demands to be celebrated in a context where the outward bonds of communion are also intact. Here’s an excerpt:ĮCCLESIA DE EUCHARISTIA, CHAPTER FOUR, THE EUCHARIST AND ECCLESIAL COMMUNION I certainly wouldn’t receive Holy Communion if I did. The Encyclical Letter, ECCLESIA DE EUCHARISTIA, gives me pause about attending an SSPX Mass. We simply want a reverent, well prayed Mass. And though some reading may assume we’re whacko traditionalists, we’re not. Or do we drive to the local SSPX chapel? We don’t want to do that, but we may be forced because of our traditional leanings. Do we drive two and a half hours to the nearest FSSP every Sunday? I don’t know that we can afford that. ![]() What are people to do? We may be placed in this situation very soon. It gives our youngest scandal and prevents them from understanding why we’re suddenly going to the new Mass. ![]() They dislike the noise and the silliness that goes on even at the best Masses in our area….even though some things are “legal” within the church, the fact remains that our children believe that girls should be not on the altar, etc. Our children are as attached to the traditional as we are. If for some reason that ceases to exist (and it may), then we have to think long and hard where to go. We currently have a traditional Mass once a week. There’s also an issue here with how our children are affected. That, however, is also recommendation only. Duty is duty and liquor is liquor, as the Germans say. You can go to Mass twice on a Sunday, after all and there are enough Evening Masses, regularly, that there is no problem with the times. I, on my turn, recommend to always fulfill one’s duty with a perfectly legal Mass. This, I see, would be a pious custom to remind us of the inherent problems of the status quo, even though not in itself obligatory. However, Fr Z has any right to recommend not to receive Holy Communion. Indeed the only unjust reasons I can think of are along the lines: “I reject the Church’s teaching”, “I always wanted to go to a Mass of a suspended priest”, etc.) (To attend Mass needs, nothing but, another just reason: love of the TLM is one, at least if no other would be available personal sympathy for the specific persons actually assembled to the congregation is also one. In my research also, it seemed also quite permissible to receive Holy Communion for a just reason (suspensus toleratus is the catchword here), and it is fairly clear that the fact you happen to attend Mass there is a just reason. Sspx rome reconciliation 2019 full#Pray for an end of the division and the full reconciliation of the SSPX with the Roman Pontiff. However, there was a recent letter from the Pontifical Commission “ Ecclesia Dei” clarifying that attending Mass at some independent chapel associated with the SSPX but not actually under its aegis does not fulfill the obligation. ![]() That said, it would be permissible to make a small donation when the collection is taken up.įurthermore, if that chapel is truly a chapel staffed by an actual priest of the SSPX, then you do fulfill your obligation on days of precept by attending Mass there on the day itself or on the evening before. If you do attend occasionally, from the motive of experiencing the TLM (and not, for example, because you reject the Church’s teaching in some way), I will not recommend receiving Holy Communion, unless there is serious reason why you cannot receive in a normal place clearly in union with the Holy Father and local bishop. Unless you are for a serious reason prevented from attending Mass at a recognized chapel or church, I will not recommend that you attend regularly a chapel of a group that is not in clear union with the Roman Pontiff. The precept of participating in the Mass is satisfied by assistance at a Mass which is celebrated anywhere in a Catholic rite either on the holy day or on the evening of the preceding day. Sspx rome reconciliation 2019 code#Are there “official rules” somewhere?Ĭanon 1248 § 1 of the Code of Canon Law states: I’ve also been told that I’m welcome to attend, so long as I’m only there for the love of the TLM. One “expert” claims that attendance at an SSPX chapel fulfills the Sunday Obligation, another says it doesn’t one says that I may receive Holy Communion there, another says that I may not receive their sacraments. I would love to attend the TLM, and there is an SSPX Chapel less than 15 miles from my home but everytime I try to get information regarding the SSPX, I’ve received contradictory information. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |